Pygmalion - My Fair Lady

Pygmalion, by George Bernard Shaw is a modern deviation of the Greek myth, where leg rarityary sculptor who fell in jockey with his own statue of Aphrodite. Many versions babble of him praying to Aphrodite and granting his wish, she brought the statue to life in which he named Galatea. though Shaws evasive action sees this story in England, to draw the aspects of common neighborly flesh classification, where Professor Higgins a manhood of the middle class transforms a mere flower miss into what he claims to be a Duchess and through teaching her how to peach proper English she on her own would convince that she is of a middle class family. Shaw uses actors line and choice of words, along with former(a)(a) features to shed light on the kindly distinctions.\nThe film adaption My Fair Lady lacks the legitimate ending because Eliza returns to Higgins in the end, except in Shaws profligacy she does not return exactly bids f arewell at Mrs. Higgins household. Though we cann ot see if Eliza touchablely returns to him in a romantic way, it is not seen. But the film effrontery its positive outlook on male dominance; shows that she could perchance return to him for that reason. Though, if Eliza were a real person in this accompaniment then it should not end this way. Elizas characteristics wont allow her to return to Higginss because she does not feel the withdraw to be dominated by anyone; especially Higgins. Their personalities continue to smash even when she is refined because of Higginss attitude and pride. Because Eliza does not deal to be controlled this is why she is accommodate to marry Freddy, his character as a male is anaemic and this makes Eliza feel strong because she has control.\n obscure from the characteristics of the characters that keep them apart, it is the fact that they are of two different social classes. Higgins coming from an upper social class and Eliza from a running(a) class background as romantic as it would sound, th e leeway of living to each other�...