Genetically modified food †Allergy Essay

Genetically modified victualss are becoming more(prenominal) and more use of goods and servicesd in our community. But, they are non as safe as people presume them to be. Genetically modified intellectual nourishments dope cause a big problem in the world, even if it fag produce gravid quantities of foods, it is found that it can cause an allergy to certain foods, m whatsoever scientists had voted to relegate them and there not always designate that its a GMO. in that respectfore, they should be abolished within the world. To start off, the fact that there is a chemical that is produced that can cause allergic reactions to some people.The scientist had stated that the chemical is safe to use But the biotech companies and the Environmental Protection Agencywhich regulates plant produced pesticidestell us not to worry. They contend that the pesticide called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is produced naturally from a soil bacterium and has a history of safe use. (metalworker). The counter argument was proof that this chemical is actually not safe to use, it can overhear a mortal sicker than presumed.Jeffery Smith stated Repeated exposure via inhalation can result in sensitization and allergic response in hypersensitive individuals. So such(prenominal) for the contention that Bt does not interact with humans. (Smith). I have been allergic to onions since I was twelve years old, this could be caused by the chemical Bt. If the Scientists saying that is medicate is harmless theyre wrong because its been proven that this chemical can cause an increase in allergies. Therefore, maybe if we had all natural food growths than maybe I could eat onions now. That is why GMOs should be abolished.There are so many GMOs that are not even labeled as that how people ever know what their eating if its not labeled. Its the people have a right to know whats going in there body. Without sharing that information its crowing for the people to trust anything that is not fa rmers. Granted some people wear thint care, except there are people who do. In an clause by Peter Sand he states Hence, in CCFL sessions since 1997,57 the EU and opposite food importers such as Norway consistently argued that the declared primary design of their GM food labeling regulations is not a health risk warning, but information to enable consumers to exercise their freedom of choice. (Sand)Its not that the food is completely unsafe that is the problem of not telling them that its genetically modified, the problem is that its breaking some freedom laws. If a person doesnt knows near anything how they can make any decision about it. And my final point is that even scientist in some countries signed a petition to ban GMOs from their country. A letter was presented at the World make do Organization conference in Seattle in 1999.Ed Ayres stated that The letter expresses extreme concern about the hazards of GMOs to biodiversity, food safety, and human and animal health, and recommends a global moratorium on environmental releases of GMOs in accordance with the precautionary rule (Ayres). So even some scientists would like to ban GMOs, How can that make any sense if all GMOs are safe why do scientists want to ban them. When many people whom specialize in that stadium dont want it in the country why should any average citizen of any country.It should be abolished if even the people creating it say it should be banned. Not to mention they want to ban it for the safety of people and animals. In conclusion, genetically modified foods cause an increasing problem with the allergy station increasing, scientist wanting to ban them, and not even telling anyone that they are genetically modified. This could lead to a bigger problem with in the world and it should be stopped now. Genetically modified foods should be abolished within the world.